🔗 Share this article

For a short span at the end of August, the harsh immigration detention center in the Florida Everglades, known as "Alligator Alcatraz," seemed to be finished. The camp had gained infamy for reports of inhumane treatment and legal rights breaches.

A federal judge had determined that its swift construction in the fragile wetlands breached federal conservation statutes. Local administrators appeared to be adhering with the shutdown directive by moving hundreds of individuals and reducing activities.

To numerous onlookers, the operation of the bleak tented camp appeared to have been a disturbing but brief phase in the ongoing harshness of the expansive immigration enforcement under the current administration, which has separated families and detained thousands with no prior offenses.

Judicial Panel Intervenes, Staying Termination

Then, two federal justices nominated by the former president stepped in. One of the judges has a spouse with close ties to the Republican governor of Florida, Ron DeSantis. Their order to stay the initial directive not only permitted DeSantis to keep Alligator Alcatraz operational, but it also seems to have accelerated operations at his primary detention camp.

“It’s sprung back into action,” remarked a official of advocacy at an non-profit organization that has helped organize protests attended by hundreds protesters at the jail every weekend since it started in early July.

Rights advocates who have kept up a regular presence at the facility claim they have observed many buses coming and going as the 3,000-capacity camp once again reaches capacity; legal representatives for some of the inmates report that immigration officials are intensifying efforts to block access to their individuals.

Accounts of Unaccounted For Individuals

News outlets reported that many of the captives held at Alligator Alcatraz, out of an approximate 1,800 detained there in July before the court proceedings, had since “dropped off the grid.”

This implies the facility has again become a major center of a secretive program that transfers detainees around the country to other immigration facilities in a kind of “lawless limbo,” or simply expels them without notification to lawyers or loved ones.

“Now it’s reopened, this inefficient government-operated facility is essentially working like a US black site, people are being made to vanish, and the harshness and disorder is deliberate,” commented the activist.

Judicial Disputes and Ecological Problems

The Florida facility, which was erected in eight days in June on a primarily unused airstrip 40 miles west of Miami, is the target of multiple lawsuits filed by organizations seeking its shutdown. The initial court order was issued in an lawsuit filed by the native community and an coalition of ecological advocates.

The judge sided with their assertions that acres of newly constructed pathways, erection of large sections of perimeter fencing, and night-time light pollution visible for miles was detrimental to the ecologically sensitive land.

The judicial review board, however, determined in a split decision that because the state had initially used its local resources (an estimated $450 million) to build it, it could not be considered a US government project and therefore no ecological review was required.

On Thursday, it was disclosed that Florida obtained a significant amount refund from the Federal Emergency Management Agency for Alligator Alcatraz and additional immigration-related projects.

“This appears to be the definitive proof proving that our case is entirely correct,” said the Florida leader at the Center for Biological Diversity. “This is a national program built with taxpayer dollars that’s required by government regulation to go through a complete impact study. The government can’t keep lying openly to the people at the detriment of Florida’s imperiled wildlife.”

Individual Treatment and Legal Access

More information into the reopening of Alligator Alcatraz came last week in a different lawsuit in Florida’s middle district, filed on behalf of detainees who assert they are being prevented consultations with their immigration attorneys in infringement of their constitutional rights.

The agency demand 72 hours’ notice to schedule a direct visit, a condition “much tighter than at additional immigration facilities,” the case claims, adding that representatives often appear to find their detainees have been moved elsewhere “just before the arranged consultations.”

“Some individuals never have the opportunity to meet with their attorneys,” it said.

In testimony submitted, the daughter of one unauthorized Alligator Alcatraz detainee, who did not want to be revealed for fear of retaliation, said she was permitted to speak to him only in limited phone calls that were supervised.

“They are being dealt with like the most dangerous. They are mistreated and have been put in enclosures like animals,” she said. “They are shackled by their hands and their ankles, they shower every three days with reused clothing they all share, and I can’t even imagine the standard and quantity of the food they are given. They can’t even tell what time of day it is. Actual criminals are receiving improved conditions than the humans trapped in this place.”

Administration Position

A spokesperson for the homeland security department denied any abuse of detainees in a comment that insisted all claims to the contrary were “falsehoods.”

“Alligator Alcatraz does meet federal detention standards,” she said.

In more comments last month following allegations of due process violations, newly revealed accounts of mistreatment, and documented health emergencies, the representative said: “Any assertion that there are poor treatment at jails are untrue. Immigration authorities has more rigorous operating guidelines than most US prisons that hold actual US citizens.

“All detainees are provided with appropriate meals, medical treatment, and have means to communicate with attorneys and their loved ones.”

Activist View

The leader of a rights group said the reopening of Alligator Alcatraz followed a pattern.

“We’ve seen it in the history of not only the governor, but also the Trump administration. They initiate something, they make errors, we win [in court], then they come back more forcefully,” she said. “Now they are more emboldened and empowered to just do what they’re doing, because it feels like they have more of the Washington support. So there’s no more shame in doing the unethical act, no more shame in making individuals vanish.”

The activist added that the camp’s return had effectively chilled {dissent|protest